The iPad in Education: The Apps & Deployment

In an ear­lier post (The iPad in Edu­ca­tion and the Ques­tions — 1/10/2011) I began to look at how an iPad could be used in school in a 1:1 set­ting.  When I wrote the post, I had a lot of ques­tion.  Some have been answered; many have not.   I’m begin­ning to under­stand the mar­ket for the iPad and have a few observations.

Schools and edu­ca­tor need to first real­ize one thing as I did… the iPad is a con­sumer prod­uct.  Period.  The way in which Apple is mar­ket­ing the device and build­ing out the iOS it’s clear that they have the indi­vid­ual con­sumer in mind.  For instance, the lack of mul­ti­ple users in iOS which is some­thing edu­ca­tion would ben­e­fit from.  Not even the about-to-be-released iOS 5 will have sup­port for mul­ti­ple users and there seems to be no inter­est in mak­ing the iPad eas­ier to use by mul­ti­ple users (sell more iPads).  Those look­ing to deploy iPads in a 1:1 set­ting need to keep this fact in mind when plan­ning their deployments.

It also begs the ques­tion… “Who owns the iPad and are apps now con­sum­able items?”

What I mean by this is depend­ing on your model for deploy­ment the ques­tion and idea of device own­er­ship, the app(s) and what the end-user can do becomes important.

In any deploy­ment model, set­tings can be con­fig­ured to indi­vid­u­al­ized the iPad to meet a user’s needs.  Mail, cal­en­dar­ing, appear­ance set­tings and user-based appli­ca­tions (Ever­note, GoodReader, etc) can be con­fig­ured so that each person’s iPad is there own.   Pro­vid­ing this kind of own­er­ship and cus­tomiza­tion on a device, I believe, is cru­cial its suc­cess­ful adop­tion and wel­comed use in any 1:1 device program.

If you are deploy­ing a large fleet of iPads, you’ll want your con­stituents to take own­er­ship of that device and the learn­ing you hope to encour­age through its use.  You’ll want them to grow as inde­pen­dent and autonomous learn­ers through explo­ration and dis­cov­ery.  By engen­der­ing a feel­ing of own­er­ship in the iPad (or any school issued device) it affects the treat­ment of the device.If a user is allowed to have both their  school­work and their pic­tures, music and apps on the device they are more likely to treat that device with more care than some­thing they feel is not truly theirs to begin with.

As I see it there are three pos­si­ble meth­ods for deploy­ing an iPad and the apps:

  1. Cen­tral­ized Account Sync­ing — A tra­di­tional model
  2. Tan­dem Accounts — A blended model
  3. Indi­vid­ual Accounts — User “owned

Cen­tral­ized Account Syncing

This is the most tra­di­tional of mod­els and one that those deploy­ing iPad carts would be most likely to use.  All of the iPads have a sin­gle Apple ID and sync to a sin­gle machine or account.  For a user to install a new appli­ca­tion on the iPad they would have to sync the iPad with the account or know the Apple ID pass­word to down­load the appli­ca­tion from the App Store.

This model makes the own­er­ship of the device firmly in the hands of the insti­tu­tion issu­ing the iPad. The user had no abil­ity to add apps or sync to another device (desk­top or lap­top) to move pic­tures, music or other items.  The school main­tains own­er­ship of all of the apps.

Tan­dem Accounts

In this model the iPad would be con­fig­ured with a base set of apps that would be installed from a sin­gle Apple ID and then dis­trib­uted to the users.  Once in the hands of the user they would be able to change the Apple ID to their own and down­load and install their own apps, pur­chase music or books.

They would not how­ever be able to sync to another device as sync­ing would cause any of the apps installed using the school’s Apple ID to be removed from the device and only those apps pur­chased by the indi­vid­ual would remain.

This model pro­vides more own­er­ship in the device than the cen­tral­ized sync­ing model, but it still presents many hur­dles in giv­ing the end-user a real feel­ing of own­er­ship as well as mak­ing it dif­fi­cult for schools to dis­trib­ute new apps after the ini­tial deployment.

Indi­vid­ual Accounts

Own­er­ship is in the hands of the indi­vid­ual.  When iPads are deployed in this model the user has con­trol over the device.  Each per­son would need to down­load and install each app on their own iPad through a mobile device man­age­ment (MDM) plat­form  (JAMF Casper, Air­watch, Absolute Soft­ware, Mobile­Iron — we use JAMF) using a redemp­tion voucher or code pur­chased through the Apple Vol­ume Pur­chas­ing pro­gram (more below).

In this model the user would retain own­er­ship of the apps as they would be down­loaded and install using the individual’s Apple ID.  Schools deploy­ing in this way would need to bud­get for these appli­ca­tions much in the same way they do for any con­sum­able items as when the iPad is returned to the school the apps remain with the indi­vid­u­als account, not the school’s.

Regard­less of the model you choose, there are ways in which schools can man­age the iPads in their insti­tu­tions.  Through MDM appli­ca­tions, Apple’s iPhone Con­fig­u­ra­tion Util­ity and other net­work based tools schools can share own­er­ship and con­trol in the device with the user.

Apple Vol­ume Pur­chas­ing Program

With any model you choose, your school need a way to pur­chase apps in quan­tity.  The way to do this  is via the Apple Store Vol­ume Pur­chase Pro­gram (VPP)

Edu­ca­tional insti­tu­tions (US only at the moment) can enroll in the pro­gram and receive tax-exempt, dis­counted pur­chas­ing and use PO’s for order­ing.  Each insti­tu­tion would need to then iden­tify a pro­gram facil­i­ta­tor who can them shop at a spe­cial store (https://volume.itunes.apple.com/us/store).  The school would be sup­plied with a spread­sheet con­tain­ing the redemp­tion codes which would then be dis­trib­uted to the users indi­vid­u­ally or though their MDM platform.

App deploy­ment is still in its infancy (as rep­re­sented by the body copy lead­ing into the store — see image above) and schools and Apple seem to be try­ing to fig­ure things out as they go.

An Addi­tional Con­sid­er­a­tion — Dis­as­ter Recov­ery (Thanks Fraser Speirs — @fraserspeirs)

Regard­less of what model you choose, be sure to con­sider a dis­as­ter recover strat­egy.  If you are not allow­ing your users to sync to another device (desk­top or lap­top) you will need to think about how to lever­age tools like Ever­note or Drop­Box. Once iCloud is avail­able this will pro­vide an addi­tional option, how­ever it will also add another level of management.

The rapid growth of the iPad in the edu­ca­tion mar­ket has every­one rethink­ing how they are doing things.  Tra­di­tional meth­ods of pur­chas­ing and deploy­ment are get­ting turn on their head and new mod­els are being devel­oped on a daily basis.  While the iOS expands and new fea­tures like the abil­ity to move down­loaded apps pur­chased on one device to another shar­ing the same Apple ID or with the upcom­ing release of iOS 5 and iCloud we can all only wait and see what we will be pre­sented with next and how we will need to evolve.

How are you either think­ing about or actu­ally man­ag­ing your iPad deploy­ments? Please take a moment and share some­thing in a com­ment below.

NOTE: I’ve posted some infor­ma­tion on this topic to the ISED list­serv.  You can read some of the com­ments on that thread here.

[Spe­cial thanks to Damien Bar­rett — @damienbarrett — for his help with this post]

 

 

About William Stites

Currently the Director of Technology for Montclair Kimberley Academy, "Blogger in Chief" for edSocialMedia.com, husband and father to two crazy kids who make me smile everyday.
This entry was posted in 1to1, iPad, Schools and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Pingback: The iPad in Education and the Questions | williamstites.net

  • Nate Green

    Thanks a lot for your insight Bill! We are mov­ing in this direc­tion at my school and I am glad to have heard your thoughts. The admin­is­tra­tion is still wants to look into other options for tablets. Are you sure the iPad will be the best tablet for edu­ca­tion in the future?

    • http://www.williamstites.net William Stites

      I wish I had a crys­tal ball and could pre­dict that, but I have to say that the iPad have a very early lead in this area.  With other sim­i­lar device com­ing and going I would be hard pressed to go in a dif­fer­ent direction.

      The word “tablet” though I think is con­fus­ing as if you were to say that word to me a year or two ago I would have thought of a PC –based com­puter where you had a key­board and a screen you can write on.  Thew iPad and even Android-based device are not, to me, tablet based device by this def­i­n­i­tion and it’s word that need to be either rede­fined or changed.

  • Sham­bles­guru Smith

    Nicely  put … thanks for sharing.

    I’ve linked to the post at http://www.shambles.net/pages/learning/ict/1to1laptop/ which is a sub­sec­tion of a larger mobile area at http://www.shambles.net/ict/#mobile

    I’ve changed my own opin­ion on tablets/iPads being sim­ply con­sumer devices … I do not agree any­more … for exam­ple I was in a rice field last month just with my iPad2  … I shot a video … edited it .. and uploaded to YouTube with­out leav­ing the field … see http://youtu.be/GUxwxQm0Jr8

    I also did do a longer ver­sion but waited until I was indoors … it was hot out­side .… see http://youtu.be/LziQnWRPZEA … still ALL done on the iPad.

    ——————————-

  • arvind s grover

    Bill, we’re plan­ning a “bring-your-own” model for the new high school project I’m work­ing on. We don’t intend for 1:1 devices to be the hall­mark of our pro­gram, but we plan to allow each stu­dent to have a mod­ern toolkit. That means that they might bring an iPad or a lap­top or a Xoom as a com­mu­ni­ca­tion and research device mainly. And then we’ll need to sup­ple­ment with school-supplied hard­ware for higher-end needs, as necessary.

    To me the bring-your-own can work because of the indi­vid­u­al­iza­tion. I think the iPad was thrive in the same way for high school­ers. The shared model for me seems faulty. Though with the lit­tle ones, where indi­vid­u­al­iza­tion might not be nec­es­sary, I see more suc­cess — we have a pilot (shared iPads) in our junior kinder­garten, and that model works well.

    And Nate, I’m not sure the iPad is the best model. But if you keep wait­ing around for the best, you’ll be wait­ing for­ever. In tech­nol­ogy, almost always, what’s next is what’s better.

    • http://www.williamstites.net William Stites

      My ques­tion in this model is about the apps and if school will require the stu­dents to pur­chase them on their own or pro­vide them via Apple’s VPP.  There is also the ques­tion of the age range for the deploy­ments and COPPA con­cerns with hav­ing a per­sonal Apple ID.

  • Pingback: Problems with iPad Deployment in Education | TabAdapt.com

  • http://twitter.com/SteveHayes_RB60 Steve Hayes

    …you’ll want your con­stituents to take own­er­ship of that device and the learn­ing you hope to encour­age through its use.  You’ll want them to grow as inde­pen­dent and autonomous learn­ers through explo­ration and discovery.”

    I couldn’t agree you any more; a sense of owner ship is essential! 

  • Sherri

    We are in the process of deploy­ing iPad also.  The snag our dis­trict has ran into is the own­er­ship (Apple ID) of the apps.  If mul­ti­ple stu­dents are pur­chas­ing (free) apps on a sin­gle iPad, along with the Apple ID that was setup at the cen­tral office for the iPad , how can we tell which Apple ID owns what app?  Our account­ing depart­ment needs an item­ized list of pur­chased appli­ca­tions per Apple ID.

     

    Is there any­way to get this?  Am I just miss­ing something?

     

    Thanks!

    • http://www.williamstites.net William Stites

      Sherri — You not miss­ing any­thing… it’s con­fus­ing. If the stu­dent s are using an iPad that has the school’s account on them and you are allow­ing them to use that account to pur­chase apps (they have the pass­word to the school’s account) then that account own’s the apps (school’s).  If you are allow­ing them to change the Apple ID on the iPad to their and then install apps, what­ever app is pur­chase when the Apple ID has been changed on the device owns the app (so… the stu­dents).  This is the tan­dem model.

      If you keep the school’s ID on all the iPads that account owns the app. 

      Hope this helps.

  • Palmer

    This was really interesting…most schools haven’t even con­sid­ered the pos­si­bil­ity of putting power in the hands of the stu­dents.  I’m con­cerned though that there might be neg­a­tive reper­cus­sions to giv­ing stu­dents so much con­trol over the iPads.  Is it pos­si­ble to have the best of both worlds?  For exam­ple, at our school we use a sync and charge cart from Data­ma­tion Sys­tems (www.ipadcarts.com), and it works really well, mak­ing deploy­ment so easy.  Is there a way to use the iPad cart and ALSO give stu­dents an oppor­tu­nity to take own­er­ship and express their indi­vid­u­al­ity with their iPad?

    • http://www.williamstites.net William Stites

      Palmer — Given the fact that the iPad sup­ports only a sin­gle account, if you are using a cen­tral sync­ing model the end-user (stu­dent or teacher) would need to know the Apple ID & PASSWORD to the school account used on the iPad.  This would then allow them to pur­chase Apps for the iPad that they want.  You can con­fig­ure the iPad to the indi­vid­ual with their own Mail, cal­en­dar, Ever­note, etc. accounts, but the abil­ity to add App is tied to the Apple ID.  If you are com­fort­able with the then yes… oth­er­wise you’d have to go with the tan­dem model, which has it’s flaws.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_P64HP4YFWDBLWW2QDCBMXU5L4Q Mathew Leonard

    Thats a good idea if I-Pads can be used in schools why not. Only prob­lem is not cheap enough.

  • Pingback: The iPad in Education: The Apps & Deployment « Teach92's Technology Tidbits

  • Pingback: 528 Digital Learning » Are Schools Ready for Post PC Laptop or iPad Programs

  • Pingback: The iPad is not considered an educational tool?! | williamstites.net

  • Pingback: Configurator Makes Big Improvements To Business/School iOS App Management | Apple Stocks

  • Pingback: Configurator Makes Big Improvements To Business/School iOS App Management

  • 1966noino

    Hi William,

    My wife is a Kinder­garten teacher and has been charged with the man­age­ment and dis­tri­b­u­tion of ipads to sev­eral kinder class­rooms. Obvi­ously the indi­vid­ual own­er­ship model will not work in this sce­nario because the kids are too young. I am try­ing to get my head around the dis­tri­b­u­tion of the vol­ume pur­chased apps to sev­eral machines. The ipads have sync carts but I am won­der­ing how to dis­trib­ute apps. Do I down­load the app to my itunes and sync all the ipads that way, then go onto each indi­vid­ual ipad to enter codes gar­nered from the vol­ume pur­chas­ing store OR do I need to con­sider MDM soft­ware to help in the process…I am try­ing to help her out as she feels a lit­tle out of her depth.

    • http://twitter.com/wstites William Stites

      If you are work­ing from a sync­ing model you can use the VPP to pur­chase the num­ber of codes needed to be legal with the licens­ing.  You then have the app down­load to a lap­top with your school account on it and sync all the devices to that one sin­gle account that used the one, sin­gle code.  You hold the other accounts and put them away so that you can prove you own the cor­rect num­ber of licenses/codes for the apps you have in use.  You DON’T use those other codes.